Courtesy Computers,
Inc.
Tips for Selecting an Outside Computer Firm to
Provide the Network Security Audit
If there’s
a universal rule for information security, it’s probably the Inverse Golden
Rule: “Do unto yourself before others do unto you.” To that end, the term
“penetration testing” refers to a comprehensive and systematic attempt to
identify and exploit vulnerabilities in systems and networks by mounting
attacks from outside system or network boundaries.
No organization should voluntarily expose itself to attack—which is what penetration testing does—without protecting itself
from possible fallout. At a bare minimum, no organization should hire anyone to
conduct penetration testing without imposing legal protection from
nondisclosure or confidentiality agreements to safeguard what’s learned during
such testing from public disclosure or misuse in the wrong hands.
In fact, it’s best to hire a reputable firm instead of an individual for
penetration testing. Reputable firms routinely procure indemnity insurance to
demonstrate their seriousness about keeping sensitive information private and
confidential. To be most effective, penetration testing must be repeated at
regular intervals and when systems or networks are changed or updated.
How should penetration testing be applied?
It’s important to understand that penetration testing may be applied in various
ways. Though it’s typically used as a security assessment, it can also check
the security posture and incident-handling skills and routines within an
organization.
It’s possible to conduct penetration testing with in-house staff or to hire
out-of-house experts for the job. But most experts believe that hiring
outsiders produces better results because it models the real thing more
effectively and because outsiders are less likely to consider in-house politics
or problems. When you hire outsiders, the results:
- Provide a double-check against
in-house security audits.
- Can be cited as “objective proof” of security for
e-commerce, transaction processing, or other services that may benefit
from such warrants.
- Provide a way to evaluate an organization’s overall
security posture, policies, practices, and procedures.
- Relieve in-house staff of the burden of such testing,
which is time-consuming and labor-intensive.
Here are
the criteria that you should use to select a suitable penetration-testing
vendor:
- Confidentiality: Does the vendor explicitly
state it will preserve and protect the information it develops during
testing from disclosure to any other parties?
- Liability/indemnification: Does the vendor carry
sufficient liability insurance or bonding to cover any losses associated
with disclosure of sensitive or proprietary information resulting from
penetration testing or from damages incurred during such testing?
- Cutout identification: When penetration testing is
under way, testers should work under an in-house staff member designated
as a monitor/manager. This person must be kept informed about activities
and can intercede, suspend, or stop testing at any time. This is something
that the vendor should ask for without coaching or prompting to that
effect. If a vendor doesn’t mention this role and request that an in-house
staff member be designated to play this role, there’s too much potential
for harm to occur, and you should look for a more knowledgeable vendor.
- Qualifications: Vendor personnel must have
strong technical credentials, and the vendor should be able to cite
positive evaluations, provide reference accounts, and show strong
familiarity with a hiring organization’s security situation.
- Security policy: Any competent vendor will
request an opportunity to review the hiring organization’s security policy
to help it understand prevailing security standards, practices,
procedures—and potential weaknesses.
- Targets and “inside info”: Hiring companies must balance
how much they tell penetration testers against how much time, effort, and
expense testing takes. Sometimes, testing concludes more quickly and
cheaply if testers are aware of specific information (such as IP address
ranges, system footprinting data, telephone
extensions, etc.). Likewise, critical production systems declared “off
limits” during testing must be identified.
- Security savvy: Hiring organizations should
ask vendors to describe their testing techniques, tools, and processes.
Only those vendors who understand footprinting,
enumeration, vulnerabilities, and exploits are worth hiring.
- Reporting results: It’s essential to agree in
writing what reports and recommendations a vendor will provide as the
results of its work. Ideally, you should be able to pick from a set of
examples from the vendor and to work out detailed specs for results. Also,
you should request copies of all logs, reports, and other raw data
collected during the testing process.
Beyond these items, normal rules of business engagement also apply. This means
that vendors should be bound to a specific contract with terms and conditions
that specify a statement of work, causes for termination, confidentiality and
liability, indemnification, and so forth. Armed with this information, as well
as a concerted follow-up to ensure that promises and delivery coincide,
penetration testing offers useful and informative (if sometimes scary) results.